Why is business still bad? Because corporations cannot earn profits and
the system does not allow them to make a profit.
Not only corporations but also nations and households are in deficit.
Nations, households and corporations are heavily in debt. The economy is in an
extremely poor state. Why are corporations, nations and households in debt? The
problem is the system.
If the situation is left as it is, the free economy will undoubtedly collapse,
leaving environment and energy issues behind as a parting gift. This is because
the present system denies the market, rather than because capitalism is wrong.
Though we have benefited from the market, we have given it little courtesy
and so are now paying the price.
As to the future direction, should we choose the NFL or MLB? NFL is the
world’s best economic system that the U.S. has created.
Laissez-faire means to let the market go unchecked. On the other hand,
controlling and planning deny the market.
If the market goes unchecked, monopoly or oligopoly would result, which
would signal the end of the market. The market is a human-induced system, and is
maintained by finely-balanced mechanisms. Leaving the market in its natural state
is like abandoning control of the market.
Conversely, if the market is controlled, its functions will not work.
The market should be protected, which means it should be regulated and
controlled.
People sometimes have the wrong idea about planning. Planning does not
mean to plan economic activities directly; rather, it means to construct and
control the market system according to a program.
What the economy needs now is not a sponsor or controller, but a judge
and a guardian.
There is a problem not in the ability, but in the system. Even now, the
ability of the U.S. is the best in the world, and there is no other county that
has the ability to replace the U.S. The problem lies in the system of the
market.
Structure Economy aims to create, in a well-planned manner, such a system
that allows nations, corporations and households to earn profits.
p.s.
A problem in strengthening the foundation of the credit system is refund
guarantee. The key point is not the purchase of bad debts but refund guarantee.
Namely, the focus should be on the contents of debt. This concerns the housing
issue and those on low incomes.
If bad debts are simply purchased and released on the market, the housing
market might slump. We must remember there is a shortage of houses for
low-income earners.
It is necessary to reconsider the original purpose of subprime loans,
which was a shortage of houses for low-income earners. The keywords here are
low-income earners and shortage of houses. In addition, ability to pay,
shortage of mortgages, and means of payment are three important elements.
The keywords are aggregate liabilities, profit and loss, and cash flow. Annual
income and expenditure, and the eventual loss, are important rather than
aggregate liabilities. The problem is how much can be recovered. The problem is
not the mere reduction of liabilities of financial institutions. Profit and
loss should be set up in line with the cash flow, and also based on the
capitalization method.
If there is a shortage of houses and problems in ability to pay, one
solution is to purchase houses and shift them from bulk sale to rent.
It is also important to try to raise the incomes of those on low incomes.
The best solution is a policy of turning around the overall economy rather than
launching public work projects or taking guarantee measures.